• 02:52:15 am on January 16, 2009 | 3
    Tags: , , , ,

    Guy Kawasaki is right, I was wrong…

    OK, this is going to be a short entry (no, don’t celebrate – I will go back to my old self in the next one).  This is a very hard for me to say… but… here it goes… I…was… wr…. wrong.  That’s right I was wrong.  I decided to come clean and admit it.  Not only was I wrong, but Guy Kawasaki was right (yeah, no big surprise there – I know).  Allow me to ‘splain myself.

    I was reading Guy’s post on the Art of Customer Service, which I believe is a summary of a chapter in his latest book, on how to do Customer Service well at an organization.  And he goes on with a list of 16 items to consider.  He says lots of truths (start at the top, accept responsibility, empower your employees, etc.).  All proven truths about customer service and which I have  said and written about over the years.  Then he writes (on number 12) Use Operators.  Then, the next one, Use a callback System.

    My first reaction was, like I always do when I hear this advice, was to think “Boy, is he wrong.  He does not know of the higher costs without returns if you use humans, or how good automated systems can be if done properly, and how expensive and useless callback systems are.  I have been researching this stuff for a long time, I know this stuff really well — I am right, and he is wrong”.  That was just about a split second before the devil’s advocate side of my brain (I think it is a small portion of my super-ego) fired back saying “Why? Why is he wrong”.  That was the end of a peaceful afternoon.  The brainstorming that ensued led me to this post.

    See, I can easily say that something for customer service should be done one way or the other.  I have lots of experience and examples of organizations doing it differently and getting bad or horrible results.  Also have many great examples of others who did it my way and succeeded.  Alas, there are also examples of organizations that took a chance with a technology, a tool, or a method that was not endorsed by an”expert”.  Organizations that found that using Operators instead of a PBX got them good results.  Others who found that using a callback system was just what they needed for the experience they were creating.  People who took chances, did something different and triumphed.

    That is when I had this epiphany – I was wrong, and I have been wrong many times before.  I will, from now on, endorse people willing to take calculated risks.  Instead of using my knowledge to say what cannot be done, turn it around and advice companies how to do things differently and succeed.  How to analyze risks and rewards within a vision of their best interest (and that of their customers) and move forward with things that may not have been recommended.  See, Guy was right – and for teaching me that lesson I thank him.

    What about you?  Have you done something against the norm and triumphed?  Let me know your story…

    Advertisements
     

Comments

  • Haim Toeg 9:50 pm on January 16, 2009 | # | Reply

    Esteban – in my experience in the enterprise software world I found that using operators (level one, triage, whatever people want to call them) is beneficial to customer satisfaction as well as to employee well being. If our employees are professionals and need time to do research, recreate problems, generate knowledge, etc., it is hard to expect them to do so if we operate our customer support team using call center disciplines. I have made this change in several organizations I was responsible for and the benefits were always immediate and sustainable.

    So here – I did something against common wisdom and triumphed…

    • Esteban Kolsky 11:50 am on January 21, 2009 | # | Reply

      Haim,

      Thanks for the story and for reading. I think that going against common wisdom is a good thing when you know what you are doing and what the results you expect are, bad thing otherwise (which unfortunately is where lots of people end up – trying to do something unconventional without a pre-planned result set).

      Thanks for reading, glad you are enjoying it!

  • Chat? Again? Are You Serious? « eVergance Blog 9:24 pm on March 4, 2009 | # | Reply

    […] for real-time communications is unparalleled (even call-back cannot accomplish the same, and I already talked about that), and if you do it right (you know, integrated with business rules, automate it with chat bots, tie […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: